Legal Updates

Court of Federal Claims Rejects Design-Build Contractor's Differing Site Conditions Claim

This December, the Court of Federal Claims rejected a design-build contractor’s request for compensation for differing site conditions. In Metcalf Const. Co., Inc. v. United States, No.  07-777C, 2011 WL 6145128 (Fed. Cl. Dec. 9, 2011), the U.S.… Read More
Read More
Categories: Legal Updates

Virginia Supreme Court Clarifies When a Claim is Deemed Submitted Under the Virginia Public Procurement Act

In early 2012, the Virginia Supreme Court clarified that a notice of intent to file a claim and the submission of a claim may not always be inclusive of each other, and the failure to actually submit the claim after notifying the government of an int… Read More
Read More
Categories: Legal Updates

California Court Holds Owner Liable to Subcontractor for Tortious Interference with Subcontract

The California Court of Appeals, Third District, in a recent opinion, found that the owner of a construction project and its general manager can be sufficiently removed enough from a construction subcontract to be found liable for tortious interferen… Read More
Read More
Categories: Legal Updates

Civilian Board of Contract Appeals Rules that Government Can Pursue Architect for Specific Performance and Consequential Relief

This last October, the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (“Board”) held that the Government may pursue both specific performance and actual or consequential damages for breach of contract against an architect. In Moshe Safdie and Assoc., Inc. v… Read More
Read More
Categories: Legal Updates

North Carolina Court Rules That "No Damages for Delay" Clause Does Not Trump "Equitable Adjustment" Clause for Cost Escalation Claims

In Southern Seeding Serv., Inc. v. W.C. English, Inc., 2011 WL 6039951 (N.C. App. Dec. 6, 2011), the North Carolina Court of Appeals found that a “no damages for delay” clause does not trump an “equitable adjustment” clause i… Read More
Read More
Categories: Legal Updates

Recent Changes to Virginia's Little Miller Act Alter the Rules for Certain Parties to File Claims Against Payment Bonds

On March 25, 2011, the Virginia legislature threw a curve ball to companies supplying labor or materials on public construction projects.  This curve ball makes it both easier and harder for second-tier claimants to satisfy the prerequisites to fili… Read More
Read More
Categories: Legal Updates

DC Federal Court Rules that Prompt Payment Act Does Not Create Private Cause of Action

This September, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia considered an issue of first impression in the District of Columbia – whether the federal Prompt Payment Act (“PPA”), codified at 31 U.S.C. §§ 3901-3907, creates… Read More
Read More
Categories: Legal Updates

Nevada's Highest Court Upholds Award Against Electrical Subcontractor That Reneged On Pre-Bid Price Quote

This July, the Nevada Supreme Court ruled that a contractor was entitled to rely on a subcontractor’s withdrawn bid under the doctrine of promissory estoppel. In Dynalectric Co. of Nev. v. Clark & Sullivan Constructors, Inc., No. 51758, 12… Read More
Read More
Categories: Legal Updates

Appeals Court Rules that Improper Termination Bars Breach of Contract Action Against Contractor and Bond

To reduce the potential damage that a haphazard termination can cause to owners and contractors, many contracts contain specific termination procedures that must be followed. For example, AIA Document A201-1997, General Conditions of the Contract for… Read More
Read More
Categories: Legal Updates

Virginia Federal Court Rules that Prejudgment Interest May Not Be Assessed Against a Surety Until a Demand is Made

This past November, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia found as a matter of first impression in Virginia that prejudgment interest cannot accrue against a surety until a beneficiary has first made a demand for payme… Read More
Read More
Categories: Legal Updates